Unified Cyber Entry Point
One platform for SMEs, IT teams and security practitioners to build skills, assess risk, and get expert guidance fast.
Our Platforms
GoGoSecurity serves as a single homepage routing visitors to the right cyber service, depending on whether they need training, audit support or self-assessment capability.
Access structured cyber learning through CyberLMS.co.uk with practical lessons, awareness modules, quizzes and guided cyber development pathways.
Connect to SameDayAudit.co.uk for cyber assurance, audit support, control reviews, governance alignment and compliance-focused delivery.
Use CyberSelfAssessment.com to evaluate your cyber maturity, identify gaps and support continuous improvement with guided self-assessment tools.
About Us
Built by experienced cybersecurity professionals who have worked at the highest levels of audit, risk, and security management across the globe.
GoGoSecurity was founded by P Jegatheeswaran (PJ), a senior cybersecurity consultant with extensive hands-on experience across banking, fintech, and financial services. After years of delivering complex audits and security programmes for global institutions, he consistently saw the same challenge: organisations of all sizes struggling to access practical, credible cybersecurity support without the enterprise-level cost.
This challenge became the foundation for building GoGoSecurity.
Operated by Canary Wharf Information Security Consultants Limited, a UK-registered cybersecurity firm, the platform brings together real-world audit expertise, board-level security insight, and deep technical knowledge—transforming them into accessible, practical solutions that organisations can readily adopt and benefit from.
To make cyber learning, professional auditing, and self-assessment accessible to every organisation, regardless of size, sector, or budget. We believe strong cybersecurity should not be a privilege reserved for large enterprises.
To empower every organisation, from a sole trader to a mid-sized business, with the knowledge and tools to understand their cyber risk, meet compliance requirements, and build a culture of security from the inside out.
Most cybersecurity platforms offer one thing. We built three, connected under a single gateway, so that organisations can learn, audit, and assess their security posture without switching between providers or starting from scratch every time.
CyberLMS delivers five career-aligned training tracks, from security fundamentals and GRC frameworks to cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP, supported by an AI-powered learning companion available around the clock.
SameDayAudit provides organisations with on-demand cyber assurance, controls reviews, governance alignment, and compliance-focused delivery, designed for speed without sacrificing rigour.
CyberSelfAssessment.com enables any organisation to evaluate its cyber posture across 15+ domains, including ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR, DORA, CBEST, and all three major cloud platforms, with clear, actionable outputs.
Together, these three services cover the full cycle of cybersecurity maturity: know where you stand, fill the gaps, and verify your progress. All built by practitioners. All accessible from one place.
Get In Touch
Have questions about our platforms or services? Reach out to us through any of the channels below.
Follow Us
Identity & Access Management (IAM) Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how identities, roles, and access privileges are managed to ensure only authorized users and systems can access critical resources, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and privilege misuse.
Security Architecture & Engineering Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the design and implementation of an organization’s security architecture and engineering practices to ensure systems are securely designed, integrated, and resilient against cyber threats.
Network Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of network security controls such as firewalls, segmentation, monitoring, and access restrictions to protect systems and data from unauthorized access and cyber threats.
Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s governance structure, risk management processes, and compliance practices to ensure risks are effectively managed and regulatory requirements are met.
Endpoint & Device Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security controls protecting endpoints such as laptops, servers, and mobile devices, including configuration, patch management, malware protection, and device access controls.
Application Security (AppSec) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of applications across the development lifecycle, including secure coding, vulnerability management, testing, and protection against common threats such as injection, authentication flaws, and data exposure.
Cloud & Infrastructure Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of cloud platforms and underlying infrastructure, including configuration management, network protection, identity controls, and monitoring to ensure systems and data are securely hosted and managed.
Data Security & Privacy Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how sensitive data is protected, managed, and processed to ensure confidentiality, integrity, privacy compliance, and protection against unauthorized access or data breaches.
Security Operations (SOC & Monitoring) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of security monitoring, threat detection, incident response, and logging capabilities to ensure timely identification and response to cybersecurity threats.
Threat & Vulnerability Management (TVM) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how an organization identifies, assesses, prioritizes, and remediates security vulnerabilities and emerging threats to reduce the risk of exploitation.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s ability to detect, respond to, investigate, and recover from cybersecurity incidents while preserving evidence for forensic analysis.
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s preparedness to maintain critical operations and recover systems and data during disruptions, ensuring resilience and minimal business impact.
Third-Party & Supply Chain Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how an organization manages security risks arising from vendors, partners, and suppliers to ensure external dependencies do not introduce unacceptable cyber or operational risks.
Awareness, Training & Security Culture Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of security awareness programs, training initiatives, and organizational culture in promoting secure behaviors and reducing human-related cyber risks.
O&T, IoT & Critical Infrastructure Security Operational Technology (OT), Internet of Things (IoT), and critical infrastructure environment
As organizations adopt AI, automation, and emerging technologies, new and often hidden security risks.
Wireless and Wi-Fi Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of wireless networks, including encryption, authentication, access controls, and monitoring to prevent unauthorized access and wireless-based attacks.
ISO 27001 Self-Assessment — A structured review conducted by an organization to evaluate its alignment with ISO/IEC 27001 information security requirements, identifying gaps in policies, controls, and processes within its Information Security Management System (ISMS).
ISO 22301 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables an organization to evaluate its business continuity management practices against the requirements of ISO 22301, identifying gaps, risks, and areas for improvement to ensure operational resilience and continuity during disruptions.
SOC 2 Self-Assessment — A structured evaluation that allows an organization to measure its security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls against the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria to identify gaps and strengthen compliance readiness.
DORA Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps financial institutions evaluate their ICT risk management, operational resilience, incident reporting, third-party risk, and testing practices against the requirements of the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) to identify gaps and improve compliance readiness.
FCA PS21/3 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables firms to evaluate their operational resilience framework, including important business services, impact tolerances, and mapping of dependencies, against the requirements of Financial Conduct Authority Policy Statement PS21/3 to identify gaps and strengthen resilience compliance.
NIST Framework Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps an organization evaluate its cybersecurity practices against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework
CBEST Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps financial institutions evaluate their cyber resilience, threat intelligence capability, and security controls against the UK financial sector’s intelligence-led testing framework developed by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority.
NIST SP 800-53 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables an organization to evaluate its security and privacy controls against the control catalogue defined in NIST Special Publication 800-53 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to identify control gaps and improve cybersecurity posture.
CSA Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate their cloud security controls against the Cloud Controls Matrix developed by the Cloud Security Alliance to identify security gaps and improve cloud governance and compliance readiness.
AWS Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the configuration and security controls of their workloads running on Amazon Web Services to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
GCP Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the security configuration and controls of their cloud environment on Google Cloud Platform to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
Azure Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the security configuration and controls of their cloud environment on Microsoft Azure to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
GDPR Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate their data protection practices and privacy controls against the requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation to identify compliance gaps and strengthen personal data protection.
Identity & Access Management (IAM) Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how identities, roles, and access privileges are managed to ensure only authorized users and systems can access critical resources, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and privilege misuse.
Security Architecture & Engineering Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the design and implementation of an organization’s security architecture and engineering practices to ensure systems are securely designed, integrated, and resilient against cyber threats.
Network Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of network security controls such as firewalls, segmentation, monitoring, and access restrictions to protect systems and data from unauthorized access and cyber threats.
Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s governance structure, risk management processes, and compliance practices to ensure risks are effectively managed and regulatory requirements are met.
Endpoint & Device Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security controls protecting endpoints such as laptops, servers, and mobile devices, including configuration, patch management, malware protection, and device access controls.
Application Security (AppSec) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of applications across the development lifecycle, including secure coding, vulnerability management, testing, and protection against common threats such as injection, authentication flaws, and data exposure.
Cloud & Infrastructure Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of cloud platforms and underlying infrastructure, including configuration management, network protection, identity controls, and monitoring to ensure systems and data are securely hosted and managed.
Data Security & Privacy Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how sensitive data is protected, managed, and processed to ensure confidentiality, integrity, privacy compliance, and protection against unauthorized access or data breaches.
Security Operations (SOC & Monitoring) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of security monitoring, threat detection, incident response, and logging capabilities to ensure timely identification and response to cybersecurity threats.
Threat & Vulnerability Management (TVM) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how an organization identifies, assesses, prioritizes, and remediates security vulnerabilities and emerging threats to reduce the risk of exploitation.
Incident Response & Digital Forensics Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s ability to detect, respond to, investigate, and recover from cybersecurity incidents while preserving evidence for forensic analysis.
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates an organization’s preparedness to maintain critical operations and recover systems and data during disruptions, ensuring resilience and minimal business impact.
Third-Party & Supply Chain Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates how an organization manages security risks arising from vendors, partners, and suppliers to ensure external dependencies do not introduce unacceptable cyber or operational risks.
Awareness, Training & Security Culture Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the effectiveness of security awareness programs, training initiatives, and organizational culture in promoting secure behaviors and reducing human-related cyber risks.
O&T, IoT & Critical Infrastructure Security Operational Technology (OT), Internet of Things (IoT), and critical infrastructure environment
As organizations adopt AI, automation, and emerging technologies, new and often hidden security risks.
Wireless and Wi-Fi Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that evaluates the security of wireless networks, including encryption, authentication, access controls, and monitoring to prevent unauthorized access and wireless-based attacks.
ISO 27001 Self-Assessment — A structured review conducted by an organization to evaluate its alignment with ISO/IEC 27001 information security requirements, identifying gaps in policies, controls, and processes within its Information Security Management System (ISMS).
ISO 22301 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables an organization to evaluate its business continuity management practices against the requirements of ISO 22301, identifying gaps, risks, and areas for improvement to ensure operational resilience and continuity during disruptions.
SOC 2 Self-Assessment — A structured evaluation that allows an organization to measure its security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls against the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria to identify gaps and strengthen compliance readiness.
DORA Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps financial institutions evaluate their ICT risk management, operational resilience, incident reporting, third-party risk, and testing practices against the requirements of the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) to identify gaps and improve compliance readiness.
FCA PS21/3 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables firms to evaluate their operational resilience framework, including important business services, impact tolerances, and mapping of dependencies, against the requirements of Financial Conduct Authority Policy Statement PS21/3 to identify gaps and strengthen resilience compliance.
NIST Framework Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps an organization evaluate its cybersecurity practices against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework
CBEST Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps financial institutions evaluate their cyber resilience, threat intelligence capability, and security controls against the UK financial sector’s intelligence-led testing framework developed by the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority.
NIST SP 800-53 Self-Assessment — A structured review that enables an organization to evaluate its security and privacy controls against the control catalogue defined in NIST Special Publication 800-53 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to identify control gaps and improve cybersecurity posture.
CSA Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate their cloud security controls against the Cloud Controls Matrix developed by the Cloud Security Alliance to identify security gaps and improve cloud governance and compliance readiness.
AWS Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the configuration and security controls of their workloads running on Amazon Web Services to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
GCP Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the security configuration and controls of their cloud environment on Google Cloud Platform to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
Azure Security Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate the security configuration and controls of their cloud environment on Microsoft Azure to identify risks, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps across identity management, data protection, networking, and monitoring.
GDPR Self-Assessment — A structured review that helps organizations evaluate their data protection practices and privacy controls against the requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation to identify compliance gaps and strengthen personal data protection.